Home Now Rejected Future Rejection About Us Contact  
  Letters of Rejection  
Submit a Letter

Submit a Comment

Upload a Letter

Mail a Letter or Comments

Links for the rejected:

Interviewer: While looking over your resume that you wrote on a used paper napkin, I do not see what qualifies you for this job as Web Developer or any position here really.

Job Seeker: Well sir, it says my last name is Short...nephew to Chris Short, the janitor.

Interviewer: Oh yes! Now I see. Tell your uncle excellent work. Welcome aboard!

Letter from - Asimov's
Submitted by - BJ
Last updated on 09/25/2003

And the letter reads:

Dear Contributor:

Thank you very much for letting us see the enclosed submission. Unfortunately it does not suit the needs of the magazine at this time.

Your submission has been read by an editor, but the press of time and manuscripts (approximately 850 per month) does not permit personal replies or criticism. For your general information, though, most stories are rejected because they lack a new idea of theme. A great many of the ideas that may seem innovative to an SF newcomer are in fact overfamiliar to readers more experienced in the field. The odds greatly favor this being the case of this rejection.

Another common cause (all too common, we're afraid) of rejection is the obvious lack of basic English compositional skills on the part of the author. By this we mean that the writer has misspelled or misused everyday words, and/or mispunctuated same. Stories are rejected on this basis because a writer must be familiar with the tools of his or her trade, just as an electrician or carpenter must.

Finally, your story may have been rejected, not because it lacked a new idea, or was misspelled or mispunctuated, or because the writing was not "professional" enough, but simply because it failed to rise far enough above the other 849 seen that month.

Gardner Dozois

View Comments

  This site was designed and maintained by HTML Concepts©